Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2016 13:02:43 GMT -5
Sunniedays, I know you're reluctant to even consider any type of sexual activity and you say you feel "nothing." Really, how about love? I know you aren't happy with the diaper/toilet comparisons so I'm going to give you a real life sexual example from my own life. My college boyfriend loved getting blow jobs - it was a really big deal to him. I have TMJ and giving blow jobs, particularly prolonged ones is not only uncomfortable for me, it's actually painful after the first couple of minutes. But I loved him and I loved making him happy so I gave him blow jobs. And believe me, when my jaw was screaming in agony, I wasn't feeling sexual at all. I was just hoping he would come soon. What I did feel was love for him - and his hands in my hair, the tension in his body, his sounds of pleasure made it worth it. He would often apologize after, sorry it took him so long. And I always told him it was fine, and guess what? It was fine, in fact it was good. Sometimes he would reciprocate and sometimes I was tired and happy to just have him wrap his arms around and go to sleep. We do things for people we love because it makes them happy, and that in turn makes us happy. Maybe focus on that "love" feeling instead of the "nothing" one and see where it takes you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2016 15:13:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by GeekGoddess on Sept 10, 2016 15:59:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DryCreek on Sept 10, 2016 16:03:03 GMT -5
@mountainrunner, I think you offer a really great example. I'd think it holds true for most women and men - they give oral because they enjoy their partner's pleasure. And as in your case, even willing to overcome discomfort to do it. Probably many fewer are doing it purely for selfish pleasure. What I hear from sunniedays seems to go beyond sexual indifference ("I'm never interested"), and more like aversion / unwillingness ("I won't do it"). I could see someone in the first case overcoming their lack of interest for the sake of their partner's pleasure. But the second case, if it ever happened, would be done with great reluctance and disgust, and that'd be painfully evident to their spouse. The recipient would have to be pretty heartless to enjoy such an experience. It really comes down to attitude. I totally get the psychological indifference that might be chemically or hormonally induced. What I don't get is the unwillingness to push past it, recognizing that it's not normal. The door for "in sickness and in health" swings both ways; both parties need to accommodate the new reality. Setting aside the "repulsive chore" analogs of changing diapers, etc... There are tons of things that we do in life for the benefit of the bigger picture, even if the individual tasks aren't pleasurable. We show up for work. We take on extra projects to earn recognition / get a promotion. We take classes, do research, write papers to get a degree. Some people *choose* to buckle down, have a good attitude, and give each task their best even when it's difficult / not their favorite activity. Others are determined to be miserable throughout the process, or refuse the activity, and the bigger picture for them turns out very differently. If we can choose to do activities with a good attitude, and do them well, in the interest of the bigger picture... why do people draw the line at applying the same effort to their marriage?
|
|
|
Post by GeekGoddess on Sept 10, 2016 16:44:11 GMT -5
DryCreek - I even append this thought: why do people draw the line at applying the same effort to their marriage? It seems sunniedays is willing to do a lot for the marriage, but not this. That is what I don't get. In my old deal - my Ex wouldn't do any of the other stuff either (or too, also) - wasn't respectful, or kind, or generous in any financial OR emotional way. Wanted the dry peck when he wanted it and not when he didn't. Wouldn't hug, couldn't cuddle (complained of the hot flashes caused). He became a tyrant. So when my counter-refusal hit me - - there were no other levels to help save anything. In her case - it almost actually does sound like everything is great bar the sex. But then - that still leaves the couple at the next spot - - the partners both get to choose whether or not "this much" of a relationship is enough to stay.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2016 17:13:06 GMT -5
Really? Hmmm. In that case, I may stop wishing for an early death. If I can just force myself through this part of life, and get to old age.....retirement homes that are like college dorms sound great!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2016 18:04:47 GMT -5
Really? Hmmm. In that case, I may stop wishing for an early death. If I can just force myself through this part of life, and get to old age.....retirement homes that are like college dorms sound great! I know right? That makes old age sound fun.
|
|
|
Post by bballgirl on Sept 10, 2016 18:32:16 GMT -5
Really? Hmmm. In that case, I may stop wishing for an early death. If I can just force myself through this part of life, and get to old age.....retirement homes that are like college dorms sound great! I know. I have often said I will be the fun flirty one working my why through the retirement home when I'm in my 80's. There's a community in Central Florida called The Villages it's for over 50 and a few years ago an article came out that it's the STD capital of the U.S. because everyone is getting it on. The woman to man ratio is 10 to 1 so it's a jackpot of women for a man. Here's the article: nypost.com/2009/01/25/retire-to-the-bedroom/
|
|
|
Post by sunniedays on Sept 11, 2016 12:37:53 GMT -5
The argument some make about doing something sexual to /with their partner to please them and out of love is difficult for me to buy into. Mountainrunner gives college bf oral sex even though it caused her pain because she knew he loved it. I'm sure the bigger truth is she does it for him because she knows it (sex) will be reciprocated at some point and then she will be pleasured. Obviously I know none of the members in this forum, but I would bet heavily that very few would enjoy pleasuring their partner in some way 1-3-5-7 times a week, all the while feeling nothing except guilt and -- well, nothing. I KNOW what it feels like. I did it for a year. That advice holds no water with me, especially coming from persons who have never felt it. Yes, I get it. So happy for you. Yes, I used to give my husband oral sex even though I didn't particularly care for it, but I'd do it, because I knew that it made him horny, and I knew that after 5 or so minutes I too would be feeling some pleasured. There is not one male in this forum who would agree to perform oral sex on their partner every morning for the rest of his life, feeling nothing, with the knowledge that they weren't going to have the same pleasure at some point. For women, sexual feelings start in the mind. Their has to be SOMETHING that instigates their bodies to be physically prepared for sex. Of course I could lay there and it would be possible for my husband to insert his penis, even without me being one bit willing, or open my mouth or cup my hand around him. Of course. I know I could. Because I did it for a year. And as horrible as I felt, how inadequate I felt then, I feel a thousand times worse now.
If my husband decides to divorce me, I'd be devastated. But from reading the posts from all the "victims" of the "refusers" it's probably likely. What makes me sad is the thought that someone would leave a 30-year relationship, a family, a history, after 30 years of sex (not even taking into account the 15 years of sex he had before he married me. I understand sex is important; is it that important that you'd be willing to give up EVERYTHING else in your life? I don't know.
And being assigned the identifier of "refuser" is super awesome, by the way.
|
|
|
Post by GeekGoddess on Sept 11, 2016 13:02:04 GMT -5
sunniedays - thanks for replying. We do get a little "bashy" here over the partners. I have to say - I don't think I knew you already did go through with "the experiment" for a year and I give you HUGE kudos for having personally tried it. You have every latitude to say it's not what you want. I understand and I had not understood you've already literally been there and done that. It's a failed experiment. I don't fault you AT ALL - I think giving it a year was exceedingly noble. To me - the distinction is not actually the sex itself. In my deal, when we quit having sex it led to other forms of relationship erosion. That is the part that I think you'll need to focus on. The intimacies that are not sexual. Backrubs or even just being sure one hand touches each other as you pass in a hallway - anything that says you want to maintain a "connection" but just not that particular act that is now so uninspiring to you. Be a team player and don't be mean to each other. My deal - first he quit sex but then he quit treating me differently than he treated the rest of the world. Then - he treated me worse than cashiers at a store. He very often was ruder to me than a person walking down the same sidewalk. Don't let it go there. Do ask much on all other levels to maintain affection. Yes, your husband still may eventually not find it to be enough - but you will have maintained your kindness. Good luck with navigating your dilemma - I really hope the best for you.
|
|
|
Post by DryCreek on Sept 11, 2016 13:33:01 GMT -5
sunniedays , there are points which aren't getting a response here, so let me be more direct... * Is your husband fully informed on your position? Does he know his true fate here, or is he being "allowed" to hope for a change you know he will never see? * Is your husband part of the decision process? You say you've decided to withhold all other forms of affection because in the past they all led to sex and you don't want to start something you won't finish. It doesn't sound like he got a voice in that decision, or an opportunity to accept affection with limitations. * Have you explored other ways you two can be emotionally close? Such as shared interests, hobbies, activities, social causes that you can both be passionate about? It's a weak substitute, but at least it's something. I find myself in a situation very similar to your husband, but I've been kept in the dark from Day 1 and there was no obvious medical event preceding a change. What I can tell you is that it's horribly unfair to be in perpetual limbo because she won't tell me the reality; to feel like - maybe, possibly - a fix is just around the corner if I just do X. The horse that's forever one step away from the carrot on the stick. Being cutoff from anything that might lead to sex leaves me with zero opportunity to be affectionate toward my wife. It's pathetic when just a good hug from another woman would be a monumental event. It's an affair waiting to happen. (There was a whole thread here about how profound an event it was just to be touched on the knee by a woman.) That's not something I got any voice in deciding; something is a whole lot better than nothing, even if I'd have to accept that it'd never end in sex. As for being a "refuser", I'm sure some here would apply that label. But not because of your medical condition - that's understandable. Rather, because you claim to be unilaterally redefining your physical relationship, which is something most here are facing. In contrast, you are acknowledging the issue and doing some proactive research, which is not typical refuser behavior.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2016 17:22:03 GMT -5
Why is it considered okay for a spouse to refuse ever to have sex again - but it is NOT considered okay for the refused spouse to leave the marriage?
Either way, one person is making a huge change against the other one's wishes.
I don't see the difference.
|
|
|
Post by unmatched on Sept 11, 2016 20:10:05 GMT -5
The argument some make about doing something sexual to /with their partner to please them and out of love is difficult for me to buy into. Mountainrunner gives college bf oral sex even though it caused her pain because she knew he loved it. I'm sure the bigger truth is she does it for him because she knows it (sex) will be reciprocated at some point and then she will be pleasured. Obviously I know none of the members in this forum, but I would bet heavily that very few would enjoy pleasuring their partner in some way 1-3-5-7 times a week, all the while feeling nothing except guilt and -- well, nothing. I KNOW what it feels like. I did it for a year. That advice holds no water with me, especially coming from persons who have never felt it. Yes, I get it. So happy for you. Yes, I used to give my husband oral sex even though I didn't particularly care for it, but I'd do it, because I knew that it made him horny, and I knew that after 5 or so minutes I too would be feeling some pleasured. There is not one male in this forum who would agree to perform oral sex on their partner every morning for the rest of his life, feeling nothing, with the knowledge that they weren't going to have the same pleasure at some point. For women, sexual feelings start in the mind. Their has to be SOMETHING that instigates their bodies to be physically prepared for sex. Of course I could lay there and it would be possible for my husband to insert his penis, even without me being one bit willing, or open my mouth or cup my hand around him. Of course. I know I could. Because I did it for a year. And as horrible as I felt, how inadequate I felt then, I feel a thousand times worse now. If my husband decides to divorce me, I'd be devastated. But from reading the posts from all the "victims" of the "refusers" it's probably likely. What makes me sad is the thought that someone would leave a 30-year relationship, a family, a history, after 30 years of sex (not even taking into account the 15 years of sex he had before he married me. I understand sex is important; is it that important that you'd be willing to give up EVERYTHING else in your life? I don't know. And being assigned the identifier of "refuser" is super awesome, by the way. I do get that having sex over and over again without feeling it is not an option for you. You will end up feeling awful and so will he. I think you said a few days ago that you would find it very difficult if your husband was having sex with another woman. I guess my question to you is why? Not because I think you should do it, but because it is important to identify what that represents to you. If you strip away the layers of jealousy and guilt and whatever else is there, I imagine more than anything you would very much dislike the idea of him sharing a close, intimate connection with someone else. If you want to save your relationship, THAT connection is what you need to find a way to maintain. Sex is probably the easiest way we learn to do that, but I would think very hard about how much intimacy and closeness you feel with your husband on all levels, physically, emotionally and mentally. Given your situation, if you can find ways to prioritise that and put a LOT of energy into it, then you have a chance of stopping your relationship drifting apart. Without that I worry that you might find your connection hard to maintain. And going back to your very first question, I don't know if there is any way at all to encourage a spark of desire to come back, but pouring a lot of energy into a very close physical and emotional bond with your husband would be a place to start.
|
|
|
Post by GeekGoddess on Sept 11, 2016 21:25:32 GMT -5
Why is it considered okay for a spouse to refuse ever to have sex again - but it is NOT considered okay for the refused spouse to leave the marriage? Either way, one person is making a huge change against the other one's wishes. I don't see the difference. I think you've cast your own characterization out there, @smartkat . None of us actually said it isn't okay for the refused partner to leave. It is okay. It's up to that partner to decide if marriage without sex is enough. It's up to the person refusing to not engage in activity that she doesn't want to. It's all okay. Much of it difficult, but all perfectly acceptable choices. Everybody gets to choose.
|
|
nahmastay
Junior Member
Posts: 29
Age Range: 46-50
|
Post by nahmastay on Sept 11, 2016 22:17:13 GMT -5
sunniedays you say "I understand sex is important; is it that important that you'd be willing to give up EVERYTHING else in your life?" Yes, the answer is yes for some Higher libido partners and no for others. Many on this site have opted to stay but that is a very personal choice. You state you have zero libido and no desire for any work around so how can there be room for advice? Your decision seems to be made with hard lines drawn so the best case scenario is that you have an open, direct and truly honest conversation with your husband and find out what his expectations for a sex life in the future are. Maybe the 30 years and history is enough for him. Maybe since everything is super good in all other areas of your lives together will fulfill his needs. Maybe if he knew that the new normal is zero sex for the rest of your lives together he might not want to choose that life. Regardless, he deserves to be an active participant in the decision making of your future together as couple. There are no answers here from anyone not walking in your shoes. The answers you seek lie within the man you made vows to and may not be what you want to hear but at the very least will be filled with truths and not speculation. Sadly, your body has decided that it does not require sex. Your mind has decided that this is nonnegotiable. Therefore, whether by choice or circumstance you have changed. He should be given the opportunity to decide whether or not this permanent change is a deal breaker or not.
|
|