Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 21:54:45 GMT -5
Sorry, I should have been more clear. 'USED' by my wife...........never the kids. One more thing: Once you stop fessing over this stuff, you'll find your wife will develop a degree of respect for you. Not a loving respect, but fear. And not the fear of violence (hopefully) but the fear that when Dad speaks he acts. She will begin to work a little harder not to prompt you to make a declarative statement you will have to follow through on. Because you will have established a pattern of long suffering patience followed by immediate and unyielding action. Trust me, I went through a pathetic period when I was totally heart broken over all of this. Now it's business. The business of keeping US (Including HER) financially whole and preserving a future from which even SHE can recover. She doesn't like it, but I think she trusts it. In good times (non-negatively emotional ones) she will now even express thankfulness for our relative stability in unstable times and an unstable area of the country. She will claim joint responsibility for it -- which is fine and to some degree even true -- but I have no problem with that. I'm not here to win an argument or get any accolades. I'm here to preserve a family and raise kids that will hopefully be emotionally stable and beneficial to their community. Sounds like you guys have a great marriage. She's scared you'll stop the money flow. You're scared she'll turn the kids against you. Hooray for marriage and monogamy! /snark
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 22:09:33 GMT -5
One more thing: Once you stop fessing over this stuff, you'll find your wife will develop a degree of respect for you. Not a loving respect, but fear. And not the fear of violence (hopefully) but the fear that when Dad speaks he acts. She will begin to work a little harder not to prompt you to make a declarative statement you will have to follow through on. Because you will have established a pattern of long suffering patience followed by immediate and unyielding action. Trust me, I went through a pathetic period when I was totally heart broken over all of this. Now it's business. The business of keeping US (Including HER) financially whole and preserving a future from which even SHE can recover. She doesn't like it, but I think she trusts it. In good times (non-negatively emotional ones) she will now even express thankfulness for our relative stability in unstable times and an unstable area of the country. She will claim joint responsibility for it -- which is fine and to some degree even true -- but I have no problem with that. I'm not here to win an argument or get any accolades. I'm here to preserve a family and raise kids that will hopefully be emotionally stable and beneficial to their community. Sounds like you guys have a great marriage. She's scared you'll stop the money flow. You're scared she'll turn the kids against you. Hooray for marriage and monogamy! /snark My fear is that I shitcan her for sexual gratification only to find that I miss the kids more than I miss sex. I've immersed myself in great sex (affair) only to find that I missed the active relationship with the family -- maybe even including my wife for some inexplicably perverse reason -- more than I did the sex. Yes, here's to marriage!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 22:27:44 GMT -5
Creel - your kids are going to grow up someday. Even as they become teenagers, they will start to detach somewhat. This is natural - even if you and your kids have a great relationship. It's natural and normal for parents to drop lower on the kids' list as the kids get older.
They won't be around forever. Is it really worth trashing the rest of your life? Do you think you could maybe leave the refusing b---- after the kids are grown up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2016 22:50:57 GMT -5
Creel - your kids are going to grow up someday. Even as they become teenagers, they will start to detach somewhat. This is natural - even if you and your kids have a great relationship. It's natural and normal for parents to drop lower on the kids' list as the kids get older. They won't be around forever. Is it really worth trashing the rest of your life? Do you think you could maybe leave the refusing b---- after the kids are grown up? Sure. Why not?
|
|
|
Post by unmatched on Apr 10, 2016 21:25:07 GMT -5
My fear is that I shitcan her for sexual gratification only to find that I miss the kids more than I miss sex. I've immersed myself in great sex (affair) only to find that I missed the active relationship with the family -- maybe even including my wife for some inexplicably perverse reason -- more than I did the sex. Yes, here's to marriage!! I have that fear too. I know there are a lot of good reasons not to stay for the sake of the kids, but from a purely selfish and personal point of view I think even with 50% custody you would miss out on a lot, and the relationship would inevitably be different. Also I would imagine that splitting custody 50/50 down the middle is quite hard on the kids if they are shuffling from house to house every time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2016 22:02:36 GMT -5
This is the question everyone who decides to try to make it better has to ask themselves. It's never going to be as good as you want it. So how much or how little improvement are you willing to settle for?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 9:25:30 GMT -5
My fear is that I shitcan her for sexual gratification only to find that I miss the kids more than I miss sex. I've immersed myself in great sex (affair) only to find that I missed the active relationship with the family -- maybe even including my wife for some inexplicably perverse reason -- more than I did the sex. Yes, here's to marriage!! I have that fear too. I know there are a lot of good reasons not to stay for the sake of the kids, but from a purely selfish and personal point of view I think even with 50% custody you would miss out on a lot, and the relationship would inevitably be different. Also I would imagine that splitting custody 50/50 down the middle is quite hard on the kids if they are shuffling from house to house every time. Regardless what folks say -- university and think tank studies -- divorce and shared custody SUCKS for kids. I base this on what the KIDS say. My kids -- junior high -- tell me all the time about the struggles of their friends with mixed (up) families. It's heartbreaking and the stories can fill books. Most of the kids we take dirt biking have father's and step father's that simply can't muster the time or energy to do this shockingly fun activity with their kids. And here's the most heartbreaking pattern I've seen: most of these kids speak well of their dads most of the time. Lots of hope and wishfull thinking. This weekend, I took the whole family to Indianapolis for the Supercross races. Both my daughter and son had friends that said they might be going as well based on a statement from a father or step father. As the kids were texting on the drive down, each of their friends finally admitted that they weren't able to go for one reason or another. This happens every time unless I just invite them and pay for it. This applies double for actually riding or fishing, or any big day activity. I keep extra gear for these kids so they can do SOMETHING. We even keep an extra motorcycle for them. I'll drive by the houses of these kids to pick up their bikes after work for riding the next morning. Their folks (the mixed up collection of biological and step parents) can't be bothered to even keep these expensive machines running safely. So I do this too and try to teach them how it's done and the required standards necessary for safe riding. Damnit, in one case, the step dad bought one boy a BRAND NEW bike, but after months of riding, I found that the poor kid didn't know how to properly strap on his helmet!!!!!!! Another -- similar situation, with a dad with a $20K Harley -- didn't have boots!!!! I refused to take him till he got some. I had to explain it to his mother and grand father. That triggered BIG fights with dad and step dad. Somehow he got the boots. Rant over. Now I'm mad. No thanks. I'll happily stay sexless while my kids need me HERE.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 9:41:06 GMT -5
My fear is that I shitcan her for sexual gratification only to find that I miss the kids more than I miss sex. I've immersed myself in great sex (affair) only to find that I missed the active relationship with the family -- maybe even including my wife for some inexplicably perverse reason -- more than I did the sex. Yes, here's to marriage!! I have that fear too. I know there are a lot of good reasons not to stay for the sake of the kids, but from a purely selfish and personal point of view I think even with 50% custody you would miss out on a lot, and the relationship would inevitably be different. Also I would imagine that splitting custody 50/50 down the middle is quite hard on the kids if they are shuffling from house to house every time. I'm a little riled now. One more anecdote: The worthless feuding dad of one of these boys (the one without the boots) bought him a YZ125. Actually he took him to buy the bike. I'm told that the boy paid for it on his own. Dad didn't have time to get it ride worthy. So my son and I did that. We went riding and had a great day at the track. Since it was his first day on the bike, I told him I would pay him $5 if he could take the bike home with no broken levers or plastic. Underhanded safety measure. My son and daughter tell me that that day is still an epic story for him to tell at school, including how he beat me racing on the track and his massive hill climbs. My kids never correct him unless he claims to have beaten one of them. I would be heartbroken if my kids' favorite stories were centered around some other guy they're not even related to. Now rant really over.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 18:19:35 GMT -5
Stuff like this is why men need to be allowed to have mistresses - like they did in the past (and still do in countries that are less puritanical about sex.)
So, Mrs. Frigid Bitch wants the wedding and the house and the kids and the social approval, but she doesn't want sex?
Fine.
Since she's getting all the goodies in this relationship, the husband should be allowed to have a FWB. There are women who have been married and divorced, who are not going to demand that he leave Mrs. Frigid Bitch and the kids.
I hate these women who have EVERYTHING, but who withhold sex from their husbands and are generally bitches to them. It's not fair, and I hate these women enough that if I had a male friend in my life who was being refused, I might very well consider being his mistress - if he approached me.
I don't see why the frigid bitches, who are spoiled rotten, get all the good men. You know damn well a lot of them only have kids so they can trap a man into getting and staying married. If they have more than one kid, they may even be able to get out of holding down a paying job. Well done, bitches!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 18:34:39 GMT -5
Stuff like this is why men need to be allowed to have mistresses - like they did in the past (and still do in countries that are less puritanical about sex.) So, Mrs. Frigid Bitch wants the wedding and the house and the kids and the social approval, but she doesn't want sex? Fine. Since she's getting all the goodies in this relationship, the husband should be allowed to have a FWB. There are women who have been married and divorced, who are not going to demand that he leave Mrs. Frigid Bitch and the kids. I hate these women who have EVERYTHING, but who withhold sex from their husbands and are generally bitches to them. It's not fair, and I hate these women enough that if I had a male friend in my life who was being refused, I might very well consider being his mistress - if he approached me. I don't see why the frigid bitches, who are spoiled rotten, get all the good men. You know damn well a lot of them only have kids so they can trap a man into getting and staying married. If they have more than one kid, they may even be able to get out of holding down a paying job. Well done, bitches! Very well said, Smartkat! I am sure there are many men who would take you up on that!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 18:48:33 GMT -5
Stuff like this is why men need to be allowed to have mistresses - like they did in the past (and still do in countries that are less puritanical about sex.) So, Mrs. Frigid Bitch wants the wedding and the house and the kids and the social approval, but she doesn't want sex? Fine. Since she's getting all the goodies in this relationship, the husband should be allowed to have a FWB. There are women who have been married and divorced, who are not going to demand that he leave Mrs. Frigid Bitch and the kids. I hate these women who have EVERYTHING, but who withhold sex from their husbands and are generally bitches to them. It's not fair, and I hate these women enough that if I had a male friend in my life who was being refused, I might very well consider being his mistress - if he approached me. I don't see why the frigid bitches, who are spoiled rotten, get all the good men. You know damn well a lot of them only have kids so they can trap a man into getting and staying married. If they have more than one kid, they may even be able to get out of holding down a paying job. Well done, bitches! SK, I hear you. To my knowledge, men are allowed to have mistresses pretty much all over the world. It's just that in some places -- mostly the west -- they have to deal with the consequences of being divorced by there wives. Most western countries still protect the wives and children from abandonment to some degree. But I'm not aware of any jurisdiction enforcing any adultery laws. Maybe I'm wrong. Many of us refused men aren't exactly wonderful catches ourselves. The first thing I would put before you as evidence of this is that we chose our refusers in the first place. I know in my case, that my head was pretty far up my ass when I did that, and probably still is. But while frigid bitches piss me off, dead beat dads frost me even more. I'd say the negative impact to society from the latter is way worse.
|
|
|
Post by unmatched on Apr 11, 2016 19:10:52 GMT -5
I have that fear too. I know there are a lot of good reasons not to stay for the sake of the kids, but from a purely selfish and personal point of view I think even with 50% custody you would miss out on a lot, and the relationship would inevitably be different. Also I would imagine that splitting custody 50/50 down the middle is quite hard on the kids if they are shuffling from house to house every time. I'm a little riled now. One more anecdote: The worthless feuding dad of one of these boys (the one without the boots) bought him a YZ125. Actually he took him to buy the bike. I'm told that the boy paid for it on his own. Dad didn't have time to get it ride worthy. So my son and I did that. We went riding and had a great day at the track. Since it was his first day on the bike, I told him I would pay him $5 if he could take the bike home with no broken levers or plastic. Underhanded safety measure. My son and daughter tell me that that day is still an epic story for him to tell at school, including how he beat me racing on the track and his massive hill climbs. My kids never correct him unless he claims to have beaten one of them. I would be heartbroken if my kids' favorite stories were centered around some other guy they're not even related to. Now rant really over. I have to agree with you but it does sound like a lot of these people would be fucking useless parents whether they were married or not. Some good people get divorced for good reasons, others get divorced because they are self-centred assholes who are not capable of being in a relationship with anyone including their own kids. So to lump all those under the same umbrella and say it has to be an awful experience for the kids is not completely fair.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 19:20:20 GMT -5
I'm a little riled now. One more anecdote: The worthless feuding dad of one of these boys (the one without the boots) bought him a YZ125. Actually he took him to buy the bike. I'm told that the boy paid for it on his own. Dad didn't have time to get it ride worthy. So my son and I did that. We went riding and had a great day at the track. Since it was his first day on the bike, I told him I would pay him $5 if he could take the bike home with no broken levers or plastic. Underhanded safety measure. My son and daughter tell me that that day is still an epic story for him to tell at school, including how he beat me racing on the track and his massive hill climbs. My kids never correct him unless he claims to have beaten one of them. I would be heartbroken if my kids' favorite stories were centered around some other guy they're not even related to. Now rant really over. I have to agree with you but it does sound like a lot of these people would be fucking useless parents whether they were married or not. Some good people get divorced for good reasons, others get divorced because they are self-centred assholes who are not capable of being in a relationship with anyone including their own kids. So to lump all those under the same umbrella and say it has to be an awful experience for the kids is not completely fair. I'm sure it isn't fair. I just wish there were an example of a well divorced couple with kids that benefited from having Dad move out that I could draw an exception from. My wife's sister and her husband divorced several years ago when their kids were in Junior High. I'm sure it was because my sister-in-law is a frigid bitch. Her husband -- my BIL -- was a good guy, and stayed close to the kids. But their daughter suffered from all of it, was in therapy, and I would consider her a bit of a mess now. BIL remarried within a few years, and I don't know much about his situation other than he's happy. So my best example is a disaster.
|
|
|
Post by unmatched on Apr 11, 2016 19:22:57 GMT -5
I have to agree with you but it does sound like a lot of these people would be fucking useless parents whether they were married or not. Some good people get divorced for good reasons, others get divorced because they are self-centred assholes who are not capable of being in a relationship with anyone including their own kids. So to lump all those under the same umbrella and say it has to be an awful experience for the kids is not completely fair. I'm sure it isn't fair. I just wish there were an example of a well divorced couple with kids that benefited from having Dad move out that I could draw an exception from. My wife's sister and her husband divorced several years ago when their kids were in Junior High. I'm sure it was because my sister-in-law is a frigid bitch. Her husband -- my BIL -- was a good guy, and stayed close to the kids. But their daughter suffered from all of it, was in therapy, and I would consider her a bit of a mess now. BIL remarried within a few years, and I don't know much about his situation other than he's happy. So my best example is a disaster. So are you thinking College Plan? Or just looking at what is the best thing you can do right now and let the future fall where it will?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 19:56:19 GMT -5
My dad stayed, and it sucked.
We were not a good match as a parent and child. He didn't like me, and it showed.
Oh, he "loved" me. The man never shirked a duty in his life. He didn't abuse me, and he provided for me well.
But most of our interactions consisted of him barking orders at me and criticizing me. I tried to stay out of his way as much as I could.
If there had been a divorce, he would have said he wanted to see me, but I'm not sure why. Why would he want to spend time with such an unsatisfactory child as I apparently was? Unless he got some unholy pleasure out of hassling me.
|
|