|
Post by greatcoastal on Apr 26, 2019 12:56:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Handy on Apr 26, 2019 13:01:40 GMT -5
I am not buying the numbers I saw on the link. True, some of the categories (health care) women do control or have the most influence. In other categories ( Electronics- vehicles), no way from my perspective.
|
|
|
Post by worksforme2 on Apr 26, 2019 13:47:48 GMT -5
It's long been accepted that women control the majority of personal wealth in the US. So the 60% figure there and the 51% for stocks comes as no surprise. If anything the %ages are probably higher. But these statistics aren't what I consider important when it comes to what women control. There is a vastly more valuable commodity where women are unarguably the majority owners. They control 100% of the p*ssy.
|
|
|
Post by Handy on Apr 26, 2019 14:05:31 GMT -5
I think one aspect that was over looked is women's and in many men's cases too is "veto power." The ability to stall on the other partner's ideas.
My W used to complain about what I invested in until I put some stocks in her name in an IRA. In 2008 when her wholly owned shares declined 35% I showed her what the basis (original cost of the stocks) was. It was due to the long holding period that the 35% drop in value was still a little higher than the cost of the shares. While my W owns shares, it is me who manages things.
I was in two investment clubs. One club was 60% female but they didn't own many shares of the club. The other club is all male for the last nn years. There might have been some women in the club a long time ago.
I know women that were married that have investments but it was their H or parents that started the investments. Many women work where there is a retirement plan so I suppose that increased the number of women that have investments.
I know some people that buy silver or gold coins and to me that is not an investment but speculation about how the dollar will fluctuate.
|
|
|
Post by worksforme2 on Apr 26, 2019 18:46:19 GMT -5
My X is a paid up in full member of the female stock owners association. It's something I encouraged her to do as opposed to just piling up money in a "safe" government bond fund. She found a local investment advisor, who happened to be a woman, with a long term record of success. I should have pushed some of my money into the pile for this woman to look after. She has beaten my investments in Janus Funds and Vanguard by a goodly % over the last 9 years.
|
|
|
Post by javba on Apr 29, 2019 16:04:30 GMT -5
My X is a paid up in full member of the female stock owners association. It's something I encouraged her to do as opposed to just piling up money in a "safe" government bond fund. She found a local investment advisor, who happened to be a woman, with a long term record of success. I should have pushed some of my money into the pile for this woman to look after. She has beaten my investments in Janus Funds and Vanguard by a goodly % over the last 9 years. Please let me know who this person is. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by javba on Apr 29, 2019 16:07:18 GMT -5
GC there's a funny saying - somewhat vulgar but hey - we're grown ups - "the other guys' dick always looks larger" - How this applies to money in divorces is spouses always find someone who has more money as an example "we're not as well off as the joneses" Or perhaps this is my own experience - where I am told I do not have enough money [though numbers would disagree] IMHO
|
|
|
Post by worksforme2 on Apr 29, 2019 16:55:14 GMT -5
GC there's a funny saying - somewhat vulgar but hey - we're grown ups - "the other guys' dick always looks larger" - How this applies to money in divorces is spouses always find someone who has more money as an example "we're not as well off as the joneses" Or perhaps this is my own experience - where I am told I do not have enough money [though numbers would disagree] IMHO The flip side of this is my 1st wife. She divorced me and married a guy who earned way less money than me. Perhaps that wasn't really important as the judge awarded her a sizable chunk of my paycheck in child support along with me maintaining health insurance for them. And her getting half of the assets we had accrued set them up pretty well initially. She did make it a point some months after us separating to let me know that "he has a bigger dick than you".
|
|
|
Post by saarinista on May 15, 2019 22:12:58 GMT -5
You guys are too worried about money and penis size!
I suppose those things matter for some people, but I've tried to cultivate a more zen attitude toward money (penis size is of no consequence to me unless we're talking micro-penis) because no matter how much you have, it will never be enough if your goal is acquiring more of it. So it's best not to want. I think that's kind of a Buddhist kind of thing too, though I'm not an official Buddhist.
That said, I have excellent taste and really appreciate certain expensive things. Hence, I'm always prowling consignment stores and buying stuff with the depreciation (but hopefully not the utility) taken out.
So I'm not sure if I'm in denial, a hypocrite, or just really well-balanced!
Money can be fun, but it can also be a big hassle. It can empower you or trap you. It is no substitute for love, but neither is poverty.
I do strongly believe that when accumulating money becomes your goal rather than enjoying your life, you need to rethink your priorities. But that's just my view. YMMV.
|
|
|
Post by saarinista on May 15, 2019 22:14:36 GMT -5
It's long been accepted that women control the majority of personal wealth in the US. So the 60% figure there and the 51% for stocks comes as no surprise. If anything the %ages are probably higher. But these statistics aren't what I consider important when it comes to what women control. There is a vastly more valuable commodity where women are unarguably the majority owners. They control 100% of the p*ssy. And men control 100% of the di**s. Hah!
|
|
|
Post by baza on May 15, 2019 22:40:22 GMT -5
Australia is my jurisdiction, but I figure that the situation here would likely mirror other jurisdictions.
In most marital situations of which I am aware, one of the spouses tends to handle the bulk of the financials.
In our specific situation, I handle the bulk of ours and I keep Ms enna fully informed of where we are financially quite regularly and it's an open book. We allow ourselves a modest amount of individual dicretionary spending but anything over that is a matter of discussion and joint agreement. It works fine.
Within our circle of friends I would say that it is the wife who handles the bulk of the financials in better than half the cases.
I think where people run themselves into the shit is when NEITHER of the spouses pay much heed to the financials and just muddle on from payday to payday.
Another problem area is where one of the spouses handles the financials but freezes the other out of the process. Warning sirens should be blaring under those circumstances.
One more problem area is one of the spouses being completely undisciplined in their spending.
Yet another is the spouse controlling the finances being incompetent at the task.
In the broader picture I think that as long as one of the spouses is competently and transparently handling the finances on a consultative basis then it doesn't particularly matter whether it's the wife or the husband.
|
|
|
Post by Handy on May 15, 2019 22:41:06 GMT -5
Saarinista You guys are too worried about money and penis size!
I suppose those things matter for some people, but I've tried to cultivate a more zen attitude toward money (penis size is of no consequence to me unless we're talking micro-penis) because no matter how much you have, it will never be enough if your goal is acquiring more of it. So it's best not to want. I think that's kind of a Buddhist kind of thing too, though I'm not an official Buddhist.
That said, I have excellent taste and really appreciate certain expensive things. Hence, I'm always prowling consignment stores and buying stuff with the depreciation (but hopefully not the utility) taken out.
So I'm not sure if I'm in denial, a hypocrite, or just really well-balanced!
Money can be fun, but it can also be a big hassle. It can empower you or trap you. It is no substitute for love, but neither is poverty.
I do strongly believe that when accumulating money becomes your goal rather than enjoying your life, you need to rethink your priorities. But that's just my view. YMMV.
In my opinion my penis size is OK, Why? because it is what I have and for me to make it bigger-different isn't practical. It is what it is, leave it alone.
BTW, I really agree with the rest of your post. WTG!
|
|
|
Post by worksforme2 on May 16, 2019 7:42:47 GMT -5
It's long been accepted that women control the majority of personal wealth in the US. So the 60% figure there and the 51% for stocks comes as no surprise. If anything the %ages are probably higher. But these statistics aren't what I consider important when it comes to what women control. There is a vastly more valuable commodity where women are unarguably the majority owners. They control 100% of the p*ssy. And men control 100% of the di**s. Hah! You are my kind of woman saarinista….
|
|
|
Post by saarinista on May 17, 2019 2:08:18 GMT -5
And men control 100% of the di**s. Hah! You are my kind of woman saarinista…. indeed.because if you had Drexel heritage furniture, we both have good taste. back in the day when it was made with dovetailed joints and solid wood.. those were good times. these days, you can buy the Drexel, Baker, Karges, Henkel Harris, Hickory Chair, Hekman, Stickley and all manner of classic, classy American furniture at estate sales for next to nothing. it's great for those needing furniture,, but I hope they appreciate the quality they're getting for less than the particle board new stuff costs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2019 18:20:59 GMT -5
You are my kind of woman saarinista…. indeed.because if you had Drexel heritage furniture, we both have good taste. back in the day when it was made with dovetailed joints and solid wood.. those were good times. these days, you can buy the Drexel, Baker, Karges, Henkel Harris, Hickory Chair, Hekman, Stickley and all manner of classic, classy American furniture at estate sales for next to nothing. it's great for those needing furniture,, but I hope they appreciate the quality they're getting for less than the particle board new stuff costs. Furniture like this has declining value for the same reason as d*&cks. Low demand.
|
|