|
Post by greatcoastal on Apr 15, 2016 16:05:55 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2016 16:45:46 GMT -5
"Submit" is a loaded word. In many contexts, it speaks of shame and humiliation. But in certain contexts best spoken of in the Sexually Speaking area, it could be - interesting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2016 17:01:28 GMT -5
I've been exploring D/s and BDSM,so "submit" has a couple of meanings for me.
The first is the "click here to post" meaning, from chatting online.
The second is the D/s/BDSM meaning which is multilayered. "Submission" is the ultimate sign of trust, and since I am naturally "dominant," my challenge lies in trusting a partner (since I'm in a sexless marriage).
|
|
|
Post by snowman12345 on Apr 15, 2016 18:42:05 GMT -5
I've been exploring D/s and BDSM,so "submit" has a couple of meanings for me. The first is the "click here to post" meaning, from chatting online. The second is the D/s/BDSM meaning which is multilayered. "Submission" is the ultimate sign of trust, and since I am naturally "dominant," my challenge lies in trusting a partner (since I'm in a sexless marriage). Being submissive suggests that you do what is asked of you because it brings you and your partner(s) pleasure. There is a level of trust needed to relinquish control.
Being forced to submit, i.e. to be in a sexless relationship when that is not what you want, suggests there is no pleasure in it for one of the partners involved.
The first pushes boundaries - tests limits.
The second sets limits with no thought to how far one wants to go.
I guess I am more of a submissive in that I will do whatever my partner needs me to do to bring her pleasure. Still exploring those boundaries. Sooo much fun!
|
|
|
Post by RumRunner on Apr 15, 2016 19:01:08 GMT -5
I read the article and although it gives an example, I do not necessarily agree with it. I have seen many instances of husbands NOT being right at all, in fact many times abusive. I do think that women needs to stand up for themselves and for what is right. No, a woman should not be controlling, but neither should the husband! I have always took issue with some of the things in the bible, and "submit" is one of them. I think it should be a matter of standing up for what is right. I don't want my wife to "submit" to me, I want her to be herself and think for herself. Issues that come up in our marriage should be discussed in an adult fashion on how to manage those problems, especially when raising children. As parents and/or a married couple, it should be a team effort. This is my point of view, though I am sure it differs from many.
|
|
|
Post by RumRunner on Apr 15, 2016 19:03:40 GMT -5
I've been exploring D/s and BDSM,so "submit" has a couple of meanings for me. The first is the "click here to post" meaning, from chatting online. The second is the D/s/BDSM meaning which is multilayered. "Submission" is the ultimate sign of trust, and since I am naturally "dominant," my challenge lies in trusting a partner (since I'm in a sexless marriage). Being submissive suggests that you do what is asked of you because it brings you and your partner(s) pleasure. There is a level of trust needed to relinquish control.
Being forced to submit, i.e. to be in a sexless relationship when that is not what you want, suggests there is no pleasure in it for one of the partners involved.
The first pushes boundaries - tests limits.
The second sets limits with no thought to how far one wants to go.
I guess I am more of a submissive in that I will do whatever my partner needs me to do to bring her pleasure. Still exploring those boundaries. Sooo much fun!
As for giving pleasure..... I agree with this. The whole idea is to make your partner happy and make life enjoyable. Yes it is sooo much fun!!! I am a bit submissive myself when it comes to this.
|
|
|
Post by greatcoastal on Apr 15, 2016 19:05:30 GMT -5
"Submit" is a loaded word. In many contexts, it speaks of shame and humiliation. But in certain contexts best spoken of in the Sexually Speaking area, it could be - interesting. What do you think about her " take" on " desire to control"? That's what defines many characteristics of my spouse, her sister, her mother, etc..... then comes the other side of the coin. I don't always see myself as a " leader"! ( I make a great assistant manager!!) trying to strike a balance is never ending!
|
|
|
Post by JMX on Apr 15, 2016 19:31:38 GMT -5
Hmm.. GC - I actually think this is an important discussion in this group. I tried this exact thing with my H - but I fear it was too little too late. Here is an old EP story about it: www.experienceproject.com/stories/Live-In-A-Sexless-Marriage/5467662Not sure if the link works, y'all. I, too, have a hard time with submission. And to be honest, I am not sure when I became controlling. I am not sure if I am the chicken or the egg. If I am being honest, the "big nasty" we had 11 years ago - the incident I suspect was the watershed leading to the downward spiral of my marriage - could have been avoided if I had been a more submissive wife and not entirely my own person. We never had clearly defined roles and we never had discussions about it, so I try really hard not to be too hard on myself about it. In my 20s, I was a feminist - and in all the misguided ways. And, let's be honest, I had to step up when things went south because I had no choice. It was that or the power got cut off. That's an oversimplification, but should get the point across. Actually ignoring him now and not getting in his space has improved the way he handles things now. He takes some things on himself and only withholds the things that are important to me - ie - family finances, sex, yard work, help with the kids more than what he would normally do. He has actually taken on side jobs to make more money for the family and gone out of his way to only tell me afterwards. The things he withholds from me, all of these years, I see as punishments now. These things are things I know he doesn't even realize. He is a child of abuse, verbal and physical. He lives in the shallows of the ocean and there is no regular deep sea, there is only the abyss. He won't go there. I triggered something in his abyss and I will never get him back. It is no longer my problem. Anyway - I do wish that more people in their 20s explored these roles in pre-marital counseling. I wish the Biblical parts of it were taken out because it takes so long to unpack it and make it make sense, that I cannot even properly explain it. This article explained it better than most. It is not about the sex. It is about respect and the different needs of each party. In my case, it's also about trusting him to be a leader. I no longer can do that, just as I cannot make him figure this out for himself. Once you jump off that train, it's pretty hard to run and jump back on it.
|
|
|
Post by greatcoastal on Apr 15, 2016 21:31:29 GMT -5
Hey JMX! Loved reading your post from EP! I would give you a response but like your ex H. I need time to process it all! I thought you would appreciate this next article even better, I agree so much with the first paragraphs, especially the part , " no husband wants that!". peacefulwife.com/2015/06/18/biblical-submission-is-not-passivity/ I can look back and remember how the( fear, control, having things only her way, dominance, rejection) all those things, made our sex life less than vanilla! It molded in the behavior of, " you have to be passive with your wife, to please her". 23 yrs. later...look at the results. Just one example: my wife stopped me from French kissing. I don't know if I can have a 50/50 relationship. Leadership is not my gift. I think more of a 45/55 would work. Instead I live in a 90/10. Me being the ten. Yet I look back on my years of independence, that I know I am still capable of. Time will change things. Great to hear from you, as always!
|
|
|
Post by JMX on Apr 15, 2016 21:46:55 GMT -5
This is a pretty good article. Here's the thing - if neither of you are particularly religious, these thoughts never crossed your mind in the beginning and the roles were never clearly defined from the get-go, then it is doomed.
That has been our problem. That and he cannot communicate how he feels or what he is thinking because of past abuse. He just shuts down. I guess, for me, these would be discussions I would have to have with the next one. And well before any relationship was truly serious.
It's an interesting roadmap, and although I (again) understand why it is Biblical, that part does not get it for me. I am interested in rereading it for clarity though! Thanks GC.
|
|
|
Post by tamara68 on Apr 16, 2016 4:24:29 GMT -5
I am not religious, although both my husband and I have had a relligious background in our childhood. Since my husband has begon to realize that there is a significant chance that I will leave him one day, he has been bringing up religious arguments. One of them that the man is the head of the family according to the bible. It annoys me enormously that now all of a sudden he is dragging God into it. In my opinion the bible is a human interpretation of life and religion and it is purely a wish of men (in biblical times) having women submit to them. Most of all I really can't stand it to bring up religion only when it can be used as a controlling tool.
|
|
|
Post by RumRunner on Apr 16, 2016 6:23:47 GMT -5
I am not religious, although both my husband and I have had a relligious background in our childhood. Since my husband has begon to realize that there is a significant chance that I will leave him one day, he has been bringing up religious arguments. One of them that the man is the head of the family according to the bible. It annoys me enormously that now all of a sudden he is dragging God into it. In my opinion the bible is a human interpretation of life and religion and it is purely a wish of men (in biblical times) having women submit to them. Most of all I really can't stand it to bring up religion only when it can be used as a controlling tool. I agree. Religion seems to make a woman less of a human than that of man. That sounds like the attitude of a narcissist to me.
|
|
|
Post by greatcoastal on Apr 16, 2016 6:26:19 GMT -5
I am not religious, although both my husband and I have had a relligious background in our childhood. Since my husband has begon to realize that there is a significant chance that I will leave him one day, he has been bringing up religious arguments. One of them that the man is the head of the family according to the bible. It annoys me enormously that now all of a sudden he is dragging God into it. In my opinion the bible is a human interpretation of life and religion and it is purely a wish of men (in biblical times) having women submit to them. Most of all I really can't stand it to bring up religion only when it can be used as a controlling tool. There is nothing wrong with what you said! I'm afraid others will not even read this because it mentions the bible. Rightly so, when people mis-use scripture. Jesus talked about that very same thing in his dealings with prophets, kings, Pharisees, etc...hypocrites basically. ( casting the first stone, the plank in your own eye, turning of the tables, righting names in the sand, etc.. ) just because the bible says a quarrelsome wife is like a dripping faucet. Doesn't mean that a quarrelsome husband can't be like one too! I personally read these things and look at the strength in them for everyone, and how to use it in every day situations. ( I awe at how timeless they are!) I think this applies to husbands, or anyone who is cursed with a desire to control. We all need to learn that times of submission has it's place. Compromise, is a better way of looking at it. Sex and marriage IS about submission and trust, on both sides. by " claiming" to be the head of the family, ( in words only) your husband is taking all the blame of your marital problems, weather he realizes it or not! An opportunity to vent your disappointment in him, on his deaf ears! Reason number 69, to divorce him.
|
|
|
Post by JMX on Apr 16, 2016 6:33:21 GMT -5
GC - I think people get so very hung up on it being Biblical and I think the way you explained it here was a good way to explain it.
|
|
|
Post by JMX on Apr 16, 2016 6:44:08 GMT -5
Shoot! I hit send before I was ready. Anyway - I (again) am not religious. That doesn't mean that I don't take the 10 commandments to heart. My life is easier if I don't kill someone, etc. my marriage would have been easier if I had submitted a little more. What I am interested in for you - GC - is that you all kind of defined your roles from the get-go. You allowed her to be more dominant. That is a difficult ship to right. I am not saying that you abdicated your power - but when you set up your current situation - how far did you all go in discussing boundaries and the realms of each person's duty? Did anyone have misgivings before embarking on it that weren't totally fleshed out before doing so? Not long ago - husband was excited about his new position and what he is making now and he said: "you could be a stay at home mom soon!" He sounded and looked hopeful. But it made me understand how far apart we are in this - I have never wanted to be a SAHM and I told him this much. This is 13 years into a marriage where I have always been a working mom. I don't ever complain about working, I complained about him not working. He doesn't understand because he didn't know who I was and maybe still doesn't know who I am. These conversations in the beginning are very important. We didn't have these on the level of depth that we should have, but we're pregnant when we got married - so things were a little rushed
|
|