|
Post by ironhamster on Apr 20, 2019 8:43:41 GMT -5
For the love of God tell me you are not utilizing the poodle in the same manner as a gerbil would be used. Sounds like a trip to the ER. Just exactly how does one utilize a gerbil when engaged in a sexual act? Ok. I post all sorts of stuff that will raise some people's eyebrows, but this is not my kink and I have never tried it. One partner inserts a tube into the other's butt, then puts the gerbil into the tube, and the gerbil licks the natural secretions from the anus. I hear some talk about pulling the tube and leaving the gerbil inside, which strikes me as an unlikely urban myth because gerbils are burrowing creatures and could cause a lot of damage to sensitive flesh.
|
|
|
Post by worksforme2 on Apr 20, 2019 9:13:31 GMT -5
Catnip body wash perhaps? Cats are not trainable. Maybe a remote controlled vibrating nut ring? Dogs are trainable. I got a cold dog nose against my butthole one time, but it really didn't add anything to the experience. Cats are trainable as I have seen several animal acts where cats performed a # of different feats for entertainment. And in my youth I also had the unexpected dog's cold nose in my ass experience. Talk about a game changer.
|
|
|
Post by nyctos on Apr 22, 2019 15:01:54 GMT -5
nyctos said: "After 3 and a half years of nothing and knowing she watches porn at least occasionally, I can't chalk it up to a difference in libido" Assuming that you now realize that she is interested in sex, just not sex with you, are you going to stay or leave? Well, stay at least for now. 1 kids 2 I doubt I'm going to get a happy sex life anywhere else 3 I can probably handle it if I get other issues of the marriage worked out
|
|
|
Post by saarinista on Apr 23, 2019 0:52:39 GMT -5
Just exactly how does one utilize a gerbil when engaged in a sexual act? Ok. I post all sorts of stuff that will raise some people's eyebrows, but this is not my kink and I have never tried it. One partner inserts a tube into the other's butt, then puts the gerbil into the tube, and the gerbil licks the natural secretions from the anus. I hear some talk about pulling the tube and leaving the gerbil inside, which strikes me as an unlikely urban myth because gerbils are burrowing creatures and could cause a lot of damage to sensitive flesh. Finally, ironhamster a kink I know more about than you! LOL (Not saying that in a negative way, I'm just not as adventurous-at least not yet! haha} I had a friend who was a doctor, and she credibly claimed that at least once, a guy came to the ER with a gerbil that had to be extracted from his anus. Somehow, things went awry. I can't imagine doing such a thing, mainly because I love animals too much to possibly hurt one that way. However, I also have no desire to have a rodent nibbling on my mucous membranes-or whatever it is that lines your anus. It could cause serious problems, and let's just leave it at that.
|
|
|
Post by csl on Apr 23, 2019 11:20:14 GMT -5
I know of one couple of sexless marriage survivors that are a bit kinky. In order for the woman to know her husband is willing and capable, she practices orgasm denial. He is not allowed to cum for months at a time. I know that sounds cruel, but, he gets daily hand jobs, blowjobs, and sex. This is one instance of a couple that have found a mutually agreeable way to increase the drive of one to match the drive of the other. Who doing the practicing, or, to be more precise, non-practicing? Is she the one not orgasming or him? If she is forbidding him from orgasming, how is that different from an SM? Especially if he gets daily sex without being allowed to orgasm? As I said, sounds like another version of an SM, only crueller. Or am I misunderstanding something here?
|
|
|
Post by Handy on Apr 23, 2019 16:17:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ironhamster on Apr 23, 2019 22:59:15 GMT -5
I know of one couple of sexless marriage survivors that are a bit kinky. In order for the woman to know her husband is willing and capable, she practices orgasm denial. He is not allowed to cum for months at a time. I know that sounds cruel, but, he gets daily hand jobs, blowjobs, and sex. This is one instance of a couple that have found a mutually agreeable way to increase the drive of one to match the drive of the other. Who doing the practicing, or, to be more precise, non-practicing? Is she the one not orgasming or him? If she is forbidding him from orgasming, how is that different from an SM? Especially if he gets daily sex without being allowed to orgasm? As I said, sounds like another version of an SM, only crueller. Or am I misunderstanding something here? She runs the show. He is not allowed to reach orgasm. During sex, when she cums, she cums for both of them. I do not believe orgasms need to happen for great sex. The worst sex I ever had I was quick to orgasm. Once I found out how to desensitize myself, I was able to get much more enjoyable out of a long vigorous romp even if I never achieved orgasm. It's the trip, not the destination.
|
|
|
Post by workingonit on Apr 24, 2019 5:41:07 GMT -5
Also sounds a bit one sided to me Well, it was only one side, and that was too much as it was. Lesson learned. Dogs out, door closed. I don't think you can assume it was one sided. Dogs seriously enjoy shoving their noses in asses. The dog probably had to go out and lick his balls after that
|
|